1
Quick Take: I recently told you how Minnesota's solar formula could distress utilities, since it claims they should be paying MORE than the retail rate to net metering customers.
Now
Scientific American has weighed in on the topic, in a lengthy and
well-researched article that not-so-subtly blames utilities. Although it
explains both sides of the controversy, it refers to utilities with
phrases like "old guard" and "malice" and "propaganda war." Skim the
summary or, better yet, read the full article, which predicts that utilities are losing the battle. – Jesse Berst
Americans are battling over sunshine. A regulatory skirmish has broken out over rooftop solar, which threatens utilities.
In response, utilities are launching what scientific American calls a "propaganda war" against solar.
The solar cost battle is already won
David
Crane, CEO energy company NRG, says: "The solar cost battle has been
won. It's all friction costs." He means that the cost of solar panels
has already dropped to the point they theoretically make solar as cheap
as grid electricity. By "friction" Crane means the cost of finding the
panels, the installer, and then filing all the paperwork. These costs
double the cost of the residential solar system.
But
the cost to homeowners is near zero in some areas, thanks to solar
companies that pay all the upfront costs in return for a long-term
contract from the homeowner. That contract gives them a monthly bill
that is less than their current bill from their utility.
The
article also includes a lengthy description of the attempt by Arizona
Public Services to find an equitable alternative to the current net
metering regulations, and the solar progress in other states.
Jesse Berst is the founder and Chief Analyst of SGN and Chairman of the Smart Cities Council, an industry coalition.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário